READ HERE WHAT SOME PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY |
||||
I bought an L reg Rover 420 GSI from the Castle Bank branch of Arnold Clark. This is what happened!!. At the time of purchase of the car I identified an oil leak and the garage agreed to investigate this prior to collection of the car. To repair this oil leak, which was on the right hand side of the engine, the cylinder head gasket was replaced. In addition, two metal water coolant pipes were replaced because of corrosion. Both were leaking coolant. 14/7/98: I collected the car. When I collected the car I found that the driver’s floor was flooded with water. I did not notify this to the garage as it was closing for the night. 15/7/98: I heard a rattle from the catalytic converter. I reported this problem and the water leak problem to the garage by telephone to the sales man I dealt with. The garage was unable to look at the car until 21/7/98. During this time I purchased a brand new CD multichanger stereo and fitted it. This stereo cost approximately £330 and was working perfectly. 21/7/98: I delivered the car to the garage for a catalytic converter emission test and for them to identify and repair the source of the water leak. 23/7/98: I telephoned the Service Department to enquire about the car and was told that it was ready for collection. When I arrived I found that the catalytic converter had not been looked at because the emissions machine was out of order. The garage had decided that the water leak had occurred as a result of the roof aerial being damaged prior to purchase (this was held on by two fixing screws and moulding, the moulding had burst and only one screw was holding the aerial in place which was letting water in and causing the flood on the driver’s floor). The garage replaced the roof aerial but in the process had to remove the new stereo to fit the aerial plug. The stereo was levered out causing damage to the casing. The damage was reported to the Workshop Foreman who acknowledged the damage had been caused while the aerial was being fitted. On collection, I found that the new aerial plug had still not been connected and was lying on the floor of the car. In addition, the steering wheel cowling had been ripped off to find the source of a noise and had not been replaced properly. While this work had been carried out, a 3” scratch had been made on the bootlid where something had been dragged across the paintwork. I agreed to leave the car at the garage in order that these problems could be resolved. 28/7/98: I collected the car. The following work had been carried out: ·The catalytic converter had been replaced along with the rear section of the exhaust. This cured the rattle. ·The steering cowling had been secured, ·The 3” scratch had been temporarily repaired but the temporary repair has since washed off and the scratch has reappeared. 28/8/98: I drove the car to London from my home for the weekend. I had changed the oil and the oil filter prior to this journey. 31/8/98: I checked the oil level before leaving London and found there to be no oil on the dipstick at all. I filled the engine with oil, monitored the oil level during the journey and the car consumed 4.5 litres of oil over approximately 400 miles. 1/9/98: I notified the faults to the Service Department at the garage and was offered an appointment on 7/9/98. 7/9/98: I delivered the car to the garage to investigate the oil burning problem. 9/9/98: The staff of the garage were unable to identify the cause of the oil loss problem and suggested that I carry out a ‘dry oil test’. This involved filling the car with oil and running it until the oil level drops significantly. The car had also developed a brake judder and the garage replaced the front brake pads and discs. 15/9/98: The oil level dropped significantly and I called the garage for an appointment to bring the car in. 22/9/98: I delivered the car to the garage for repair during which time they replaced the electronic control unit in the engine in an attempt to resolve an additional emissions problem which had been identified. 29/9/98: I collected the car from the garage. The valve seals had been replaced (this involved removing the cylinder head a second time) in an attempt to resolve the oil burning problem. I returned the car to my home town where I arranged for an emissions test to be carried out by a local garage and the emissions were just on the legal limit.4/10/98: I drove the car to Edinburgh and on the return journey found the oil level to have dropped again, to half way on the dip stick. On the way through Glasgow, I stopped at the garage and informed the workshop foreman of this problem. The garage was unable to look at the car until 12/10/98. 12/10/98: I delivered the car to the garage for repair. 20/10/98: I collected the car. The cylinder head had been removed for the third time and the piston rings replaced. 21/11/98: I drove the car from home to Glasgow and the cylinder head gasket blew on the motorway leaving me stranded at night. This caused the engine to blow all the coolant out of the header tank and the engine overheated. The car was towed to the garage and the cylinder head was removed for the fourth time for investigation. 29/11/98: I collected the car from the garage. The cylinder head had been skimmed in order to be resurfaced, the valves were replaced again and another cylinder head gasket had been fitted. The starter motor was working on an intermittent basis after collection. 4/12/98: The brake judder has returned. The starter motor has become unpredictable. 6/12/98: I visited the Managing Director at the garage to discuss options with the car, ie, full refund. At this point he was only able to offer me between £5,000 - £5,500 on a trade-in against another vehicle from any Arnold Clark garage. I was unable to see any other vehicle which I was interested in, so I left it to think about my options. 7/12/98: I had an exhaust emissions test carried out at a local M.O.T. test station, and found the carbon monoxide level to be in excess for a current M.O.T. certificate. This problem has been ongoing since I got the car. I have also found that the engine is burning oil again. I phoned the branch managing director again and informed about these latest problems. After a long discussion, one option was look at the car, and try to rectify the problems, namely the oil problem in the engine, the brake judder, the carbon monoxide emissions fault, and the starter problem. The next option was being offered a replacement car of the same specification, but with a lower value, approx. £5.000 -£5.500. The third option is to take the offer of the trade-in to the value of £5,000 - £5,500 as discussed on 6/12/98. 7/12/98: I received a telephone call from (Workshop Foreman) regarding the car, and he wanted to look at the car, to source the oil burning fault. I delivered the car to the garage that evening, and collected a courtesy car. 11/12/98: The foreman phoned to tell me that the car is burning oil, and he proposes to remove the cylinder head for the fifth time, and suggests the fault may lie with the piston rings again. I have owned the car for five months and it has been in the garage for repair for approximately 40 days. Even though I have been given the use of a courtesy car for some of this time I have been inconvenienced as I have had to leave work early to visit the garage in Glasgow. It has covered four thousand miles since purchase and the present mileage is 50,600.What a pain in the arse! Nice one Arnold. |
||||
As a mechanic and mot tester with AC. i was shocked to see a car bought by another member of staff, from Arnold Clark. which had just been mot'd yet had a 1-1.5 inch cut in the drivers seat belt webbing. an mot failure of the highest degree. not to mention negligent. p.s. i have the belt as proof.. |
||||
AC Peugeot Inverness. Don't know about customer satisfaction but staff morale is s***e! Can't get parts, can't get jobs finished cos of that, get hassle from 'management' to finish jobs that you didn't start! 6 boys have left service in a month cos of bad management. Just don't know how to treat staff at AC! This service dept. is going down the pan - FAST!. |
||||
Bought a Rover 218 SLD in 1999, got a "Platinum" Warranty with it as it was a Diesel. Within 2 months had to pay £600 on a oil leak from the cylinder head gasket as it wasn't covered by the warranty. Do not go near these people, the worst company in the world!!!. |
||||
Hey Mate! The Liverpool Arnold Clark sucks to high heaven as well as Glasgow. Me Car is five days late. That include the best excuse by "Richard" the sales man; I'm sorry I won't be in tomorrow morning I'm taking the wife to hospital for an operation!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bastards 24/01/2004 |
||||
After reading all your other complaints I too feel that I should add mine after buying a Fiat
Punto in September 02 it was due an m o t in December the mechanic told me that I needed to replace my brake pipes as they were rusty not to mention the engine mounts were broken and that I had a dodgy handbrake and the exhaust had
gone. This cost me a total of £200 then in march this year I broke down the
mechanic was called out only to tell me the timing belt had broke and two valves were damaged so off it went to the garage again to be fixed at a cost of £320 so you see never buy a car from shitty
Arnold Clark again he sucks. 24/01/2004
|
||||
April 2003. I was about to pop over to Glasgow with view to buying a £5000 VW but won't be wasting my time now. Would be helpful if all comments had a date attached so can see this is an ongoing problem. .24/01/2004 great idea ! |
||||
My problems were with Arnold Clark Citroen in the Phoenix Retail Park in Linwood. Car was stuttering so took it back to get their "experts" to have a look. Was keep waiting for hours while they looked at this and that, plugged their diagnostic computer (all very well if you know how to interpret the results) and took the car for a run. Finally I was told it was the fuel pump so was booked back in to get this fixed. £500 later the pump was fitted but the car was no better. Took it to an independent who diagnosed the problem as a sticky valve, who charged £20 to flush the engine with Forte engine flush and the problem never occurred again. Not only is their customer service terrible, the prices are extortionate and their mechanics are terrible. And the salesmen are arrogant so and so's too. I hate them all..24/01/2004 |
||||
Arnold Clark now have more than a few Daewoo dealerships now, my wife has a Matiz, she is entitled under her warranty to a courtesy car when her car is serviced. Arnold Clark say... uhn uhn... No chance, Daewoo never gave us any! What a crock, who ever heard of the manufacturer giving garages free cars for courtesy cars! Twats i say!.24/01/2004 |
||||
I BOUGHT A NEW FIAT PUNTO FROM ARNOLD CLARK, GALLOWAY AVENUE, AYR, AYRSHIRE IN |
||||
|